Challenging Deliberation

25Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Civic education is a primary aim of public schooling in liberal democratic states, which rely on a well-educated, civic-minded citizenry for their perpetuation. Because liberal democracies can differ, it is important to decide for what kind of democracy schools should be educating. Recently, deliberative democracy has come into vogue as a political - and hence civic educational - goal. Because of differences in perspectives as a result of life experiences, however, racial, ethnic, economic, and/or religious minorities are disadvantaged in deliberative settings. Even if they fully participate, and even if all citizens welcome their participation, minority group members are unlikely to be able to influence debate appropriately. Furthermore, the steps that teachers or schools might take to overcome this problem in the future themselves impose serious costs on children, especially those who grow up in segregated minority communities. These costs may outweigh deliberative democracy's putative benefits over adversarial democracy. © 2003, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levinson, M. (2003). Challenging Deliberation. Theory and Research in Education, 1(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878503001001003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free