Chisholm on Empirical Knowledge

Abstract

Chisholm holds that each person's empirical knowledge is a structure resting on a foundation of self-presenting propositions. he also holds that a person's knowledge of the past and the external world cannot be inferred from his self-presenting propositions by the rules of deduction and induction; special rules of evidence are needed. i argue that chisholm has not made a compelling case for either view and that there is good reason to doubt that either view is correct.