Choice: Abdicating or exercising

31Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many people today have access to enormous libraries of digital content. Increasingly these libraries contain personal content, consumed in support of people's non-instrumental needs. If current trends persist, these repositories will only increase. Having to choose from so much could be unpleasant especially in the absence of strong preferences. This raises some concerns for user experience (UX) design. Approaches for such interactions should not only be optimized for UX but must also support users' noninstrumental needs. People face this predicament during digital music listening and yet report positive experiences when listening in shuffle. Through an empirical study of digital music listening and close examination of people's listening practices and experiences, we argue that a shufflebased approach-whereby people can abdicate choice to a random process while being able to modulate the randomness-not only mitigates the unpleasantness of choosing but also supports their non-instrumental needs while fostering desirable experiential outcomes. Copyright 2008 ACM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leong, T. W., Howard, S., & Vetere, F. (2008). Choice: Abdicating or exercising. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 715–724). https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357168

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free