Abstract
Jonathan Kirshner misrepresents classical realism in fundamental ways. His wants to reclaim classical realism, but he never tells us what it is or engages other scholars who have developed the paradigm. He pleads for a more sophisticated realism but spends much of the book engaging neorealism and 'hyperrationality.' He foregrounds Thucydides but reads him superficially and indefensibly in terms of contemporary realist tropes. He asserts-incorrectly-that classical realism eschews abstract formulations but then offers his own. I critique his formulation, reading of Thucydides, and offer an overview of classical realism. I argue that classical realism is an ethical project embedded in a tragic understanding of life. It foregrounds human miscalculations, misjudgments, and their causes, sees tight connections between domestic and foreign policy, and the values that motivate both; and regards great powers as likely to be their own worst enemies.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lebow, R. N. (2024). What is Classical Realism? Analyse Und Kritik, 46(1), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2023-2012
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.