Comparing topic maps constraint specification languages

1Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Topic Map Constraint Language (TMCL) provides a means to express constraints on topic maps conforming to ISO/IEC 13250. In this article, we will use a test suite and show, step-by-step, the way we handled several kinds of Topic Maps constraints in many different instances in order to answer questions like: Do they do the same job? Are there some kinds of Topic Maps constraints that are easier to specify with one of them? Do you need different background to use the tools? Is it possible to use them in similar situations (the same topic maps instances)? May we use them to produce an equal result? How do AsTMa!, OSL, Toma, and XTche relate to Topic Maps Constraint Language (TMCL)? What kind of constraints each one of these three can not specify? We will conclude this paper with a summary of the comparisons accomplished between those Topic Maps constraint languages over the use case proposed. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Librelotto, G. R., De Azevedo, R. P., Ramalho, J. C., & Henriques, P. R. (2008). Comparing topic maps constraint specification languages. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4999 LNAI, pp. 86–97). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70874-2_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free