A comparison of Gabor filter methods for automatic detection of facial landmarks

53Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic analysis of Gabor filter banks for detection of facial landmarks (pupils and philtrum). Sensitivity is assessed using the A' statistic, a non-parametric estimate of sensitivity independent of bias commonly used in the psychophysical literature. We find that current Gabor filter bank systems are overly complex. Performance can be greatly improved by reducing the number of frequency and orientation components in these systems. With a single frequency band, we obtained performances significantly better than those achievable with current systems that use multiple frequency bands. Best performance for pupil detection was obtained with filter banks peaking at 4 iris widths per cycle and 8 orientations. Best performance for philtrum location was achieved with filter banks with 5.5 iris widths per circle and 8 orientations. © 2002 IEEE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fasel, I. R., Bartlett, M. S., & Movellan, J. R. (2002). A comparison of Gabor filter methods for automatic detection of facial landmarks. In Proceedings - 5th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition, FGR 2002 (pp. 242–246). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/AFGR.2002.1004161

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free