A comparison of surface sampling methods for detecting coliforms on food contact surfaces

117Citations
Citations of this article
167Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Newly developed self-contained swab-based methods were assessed for their ability to detect low levels of coliform bacteria on food contact surfaces. Their performance, under controlled laboratory conditions, was compared to a range of conventional microbiological methods, including traditional hygiene swabs, dipslides and sampling sponges. Stainless steel surfaces were inoculated with known levels of coliform bacteria and were sampled immediately after inoculation whilst still wet, or after they had been allowed to air-dry for 1 h. The sampling sponge was the least effective means of detecting coliforms on a wet surface, having a minimum detection limit of approximately 100 cfu cm-2, whereas all other test methods were able to detect the presence of < 3.5 cfu cm-2. Allowing inoculated surfaces to dry resulted in a marked reduction in the minimum detection limits of all test methods although this was less for dipslides and the newly developed media-based hygiene swabs. A novel chemiluminescent swab-based assay was capable of providing results in 5 h, comparable to those obtained using traditional spread plates. The results of this study suggest that during the hygienic assessment of food contact surfaces when testing for coliforms, newly developed self-contained swab-based methods, including one giving results in 5 h, could prove a valuable tool for use within an integrated cleaning monitoring strategy. © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moore, G., & Griffith, C. (2002). A comparison of surface sampling methods for detecting coliforms on food contact surfaces. Food Microbiology, 19(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.2001.0464

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free