A comparison of two persistent storage tools for implementing a search engine

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper compares two Java-based persistent storage mechanisms: a commercially available object-oriented database (OODB) system1 and the persistent storage tool PJama [1] on the basis of their suitability for implementing the index component of an experimental World Wide Web search engine called WWLib-TNG. Persistence is provided to the builder component of the search engine, which constructs a catalogue of Web pages. The searcher component of the engine searches the catalogue. The implementation of the builder using PJama and using an OODB were compared with respect to time taken to construct a catalogue, efficient use of disk space and scalability. The implementations of the searcher were compared on response time and scalability. The comparison showed that for this application PJama performs better than the OODB. Compared with the OODB, PJama gave 300% better build performance and was more scalable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garratt, A., Jackson, M., Burden, P., & Wallis, J. (2001). A comparison of two persistent storage tools for implementing a search engine. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2135, pp. 177–186). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45498-5_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free