Abstract
In this paper, we present a comparison of four wireless sensor network protocols: MultiHopRouter, TinyAODV(Ad-hoc On-demand Distance-Vector), GF (Greedy Forwarding), and GF-RSSI (Greedy Forward with Received Signal Strength Indication). Performance measurement was conducted on a wireless sensor network testbed for medical application research. Based on our measurements, GF-RSSI performs well in various operating conditions. Especially, it shows a high success rate of packet delivery and moderate energy consumption. © 2006 IEEE.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Pham, N. N., Youn, J., & Won, C. (2006). A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed. In Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing (Vol. 2006 I, pp. 276–281). https://doi.org/10.1109/SUTC.2006.1
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
