Complexity of Value ≠ Complexity of Outcome

  • Dai W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Complexity of value is the thesis that our preferences, the things we care about, don't compress down to one simple rule, or a few simple rules.... I certainly agree with both of these points. But I worry that we (at Less Wrong) might have swung a bit too far in the other direction. No, I don't think that we overestimate the complexity of our values, but rather there's a tendency to assume that complexity of value must lead to complexity of outcome, that is, agents who faithfully inherit the full complexity of human values will necessarily create a future that reflects that complexity. I will argue that it is possible for complex values to lead to simple futures, and explain the relevance of this possibility to the project of Friendly AI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dai, W. (2010). Complexity of Value ≠ Complexity of Outcome. Less Wrong (Blog), 2–3. Retrieved from http://lesswrong.com/lw/1oj/complexity_of_value_complexity_of_outcome/

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free