Conceptual and methodological issues in comparative HRM research: The Cranet project as an example

38Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The "Cranfield Project on International Strategic Human Resource Management" (Cranet) is an international research network which regularly conducts a survey of human resource management (HRM) issues in more than 40 countries. As a result, Cranet provides rich data on the institutionalization, practices, and organizational characteristics of HRM. Whereas scholars in other research fields (e.g., organizational behavior and marketing) have intensively discussed scientific standards for cross-national and cross-cultural studies, a more comprehensive discussion on the subject in the HRM field is necessary. The present article discusses four methodological challenges of comparative research (i.e., survey administration, sampling strategies and non-response bias, equivalence of constructs and measurement, and analytical techniques) and illustrates these issues based on the design and methodology of the Cranet project. © 2010 Elsevier Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steinmetz, H., Schwens, C., Wehner, M., & Kabst, R. (2011). Conceptual and methodological issues in comparative HRM research: The Cranet project as an example. Human Resource Management Review, 21(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free