Construct Validity and Content Analysis

13Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

We clarify points of agreement and disagreement with Schnurr, Rosenberg, and Oxman, as put forth in their article appearing this issue. Speech samples elicited under different conditions may or may not be interchangeable. This is a matter of empirical research, but it is also dependent upon the meaningfulness of the content categories used in the analysis. We prefer a theory-driven, construct validational approach that: employs well validated coding schemes to assess psychologically meaningful concepts. © 1993, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McAdams, D. P., & Zeldow, P. B. (1993). Construct Validity and Content Analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61(2), 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6102_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free