Abstract
We clarify points of agreement and disagreement with Schnurr, Rosenberg, and Oxman, as put forth in their article appearing this issue. Speech samples elicited under different conditions may or may not be interchangeable. This is a matter of empirical research, but it is also dependent upon the meaningfulness of the content categories used in the analysis. We prefer a theory-driven, construct validational approach that: employs well validated coding schemes to assess psychologically meaningful concepts. © 1993, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
McAdams, D. P., & Zeldow, P. B. (1993). Construct Validity and Content Analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61(2), 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6102_5
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.