Contradictions of austerity

69Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The global economic and financial crisis has been marked by the following paradox. A much more severe depression than the global slump of 2008-09 was prevented by determined state intervention in the form of bank bailouts and fiscal stimuli. Yet this bout of apparently successful Keynesianism has been followed by a turn to fiscal austerity justified in terms reminiscent of the Treasury View against which Keynes relentlessly polemicised in the 1930s. This article explores the sources of this policy shift. Among the factors considered are the ideology of neoliberalism, the economic and political power of the banks, and the relative weight of finance in individual economies. The broader context of financialisation is also considered. The conclusion is reached that an oscillation between bouts of austerity and laxer policies encouraging the development of asset bubbles may be built into neoliberalism as an economic policy regime. The implication is that alternatives to austerity must embrace broad institutional transformation. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Callinicos, A. (2012). Contradictions of austerity. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ber026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free