Crosscutting, what is and what is not?: A Formal definition based on a Crosscutting Pattern

  • Conejero J
  • Hernández J
  • Jurado E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Crosscutting is usually described in terms of scattering and tangling. However, the distinction between these concepts is vague, which could lead to ambiguous statements. Sometimes, precise definitions are required, e.g. for the formal identification of crosscutting concerns. We propose a conceptual framework for formalizing these concepts based on a crosscutting pattern that shows the mapping between elements at two levels, e.g. concerns and representations of concerns. The definitions of the concepts are formalized in terms of linear algebra, and visualized with matrices and matrix operations. In this way, crosscutting can be clearly distinguished from scattering and tangling. Using linear algebra, we demonstrate that our definition generalizes other definitions of crosscutting as described by Masuhara & Kiczales [21] and Tonella and Ceccato [28]. The framework can be applied across several refinement levels assuring traceability of crosscutting concerns. Usability of the framework is illustrated by means of applying it to several areas such as change impact analysis, identification of crosscutting at early phases of software development and in the area of model driven software development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Conejero, J. M., Hernández, J., Jurado, E., & Berg, K. van den. (2008). Crosscutting, what is and what is not?: A Formal definition based on a Crosscutting Pattern (p. 30). Cáceres.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free