Design and analysis of experiments.

10Citations
Citations of this article
150Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter is primarily devoted to experiments that compare 2 treatments with respect to an outcome measure. Six design scenarios are discussed: (a) completely randomized designs (treatments are assigned completely at random); (b) randomized block designs (experimental units are subdivided into blocks of like subjects, with one subject in each block randomly assigned to each treatment); (c) stratified designs (subjects are categorized into subpopulations called strata, and within each stratum, a completely randomized design is conducted); (d) crossover designs (each subject gets both treatments, but order is completely at random); (e) 2 x 2 factorial designs [design can be in any of the formats (a)-(d) but there are 4 not 2 treatments representing 2 types of treatment interventions, each with 2 levels]; and (f) randomized designs with "random" effects. This is much like the stratified design, except there is only 1 sample, at least conceptually, from the strata. Examples might be litters of laboratory animals, surgical practices, or batches of a therapeutic agent. The desire is to make inferences about treatments in the population as a whole, not just in the strata that were actually sampled.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shuster, J. J. (2007). Design and analysis of experiments. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-530-5_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free