Differences in the accuracy of human visuospatial memory after yaw and roll rotations

19Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Our ability to keep track of objects in the environment, even as we move, has been attributed to various cues including efference copies, vestibular signals, proprioception, and gravitational cues. However, the presence of some cues, such as gravity, may not be used to the same extent by different axes of motion (e.g., yaw vs. roll). We tested whether changes in gravitational cues can be used to improve visuospatial updating performance for yaw rotations as previously shown for roll. We found differences in updating for yaw and roll rotations in that yaw updating is not only associated with larger systematic errors but is also not facilitated by gravity in the same way as roll updating. Copyright © 2006 The American Physiological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klier, E. M., Hess, B. J. M., & Angelaki, D. E. (2006). Differences in the accuracy of human visuospatial memory after yaw and roll rotations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95(4), 2692–2697. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01017.2005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free