The effects of cognitive style and feedback type on performance in an internal control task

29Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To facilitate the task of evaluating the internal control environment, auditors typically use internal control questionnaires (ICQ) to identify and document audit information. One drawback of structured ICQs is that beginning auditors charged with their completion could use them mechanistically, overlooking important cues that do not match ICQ prompts. We investigate the effects of cognitive style and feedback type on auditors' ability to identify internal control cues using ICQs. Student participants, proxying for beginning staff auditors with no experience, were classified as possessing either a sensor or an intuitive cognitive style. In an experiment, participants used an ICQ to identify internal control cues for one accounting cycle. After receiving varying kinds of feedback, participants repeated the internal control cue identification task using an ICQ for a second accounting cycle. Contrary to expectations, cognitive style did not significantly affect performance in the absence of feedback. As expected, significant associations between cognitive style and post-feedback task performance were found, with the combination of cognitive style and outcome feedback yielding positive performance improvements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bryant, S., Murthy, U., & Wheeler, P. (2009). The effects of cognitive style and feedback type on performance in an internal control task. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 21(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2009.21.1.37

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free