Grading and differentiation: Paradox or good practice?

131Citations
Citations of this article
285Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Teachers often perceive an inherent conflict between "differentiated instruction," which emphasizes attention to variance in students' readiness levels, interests, and learning profiles, and "the grading system," which seems to indicate a sort of rigidity and standardization. This article examines key principles of quality differentiation and of quality grading to determine whether the two facets of educational practice are compatible. It concludes that the perceived incompatibility stems from misunderstanding the essential principles of differentiation and grading, and from entrenched classroom habits that often run counter to guidance from experts in grading and in differentiation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tomlinson, C. A. (2005, June). Grading and differentiation: Paradox or good practice? Theory into Practice. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free