Abstract
The paper is an examination of hume's argument for what he calls "true" skepticism, As it appears in sections one and seven of book i, Part iv, Of the "treatise". Although hume's argument is novel, It not only succumbs to an objection that the classical pyrrhonists succeeded in avoiding but reaches a conclusion that cannot legitimately be termed "skepticism" at all.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Johnson, O. A. (1981). HUME’S “TRUE” SCEPTICISM. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 62(4), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1981.tb00077.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free