Hyperincident connected components of tagging networks

16Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Data created by social bookmarking systems can be described as 3-partite 3-uniform hypergraphs connecting documents, users, and tags (tagging networks), such that the toolbox of complex network analysis can be applied to examine their properties. One of the most basic tools, the analysis of connected components, however cannot be applied meaningfully: Tagging networks tend to be almost entirely connected. We therefore propose a generalization of connected components, m-hyperincident connected components. We show that decomposing tagging networks into 2-hyperincident connected components yields a characteristic component distribution with a salient giant component that can be found across various datasets. This pattern changes if the underlying formation process changes, for example, if the hypergraph is constructed from search logs, or if the tagging data is contaminated by spam: It turns out that the second- to 129th largest components of the spam-labeled Bibsonomy dataset are inhabited exclusively by spam users. Based on these we propose and unsupervised method for spam detection. Copyright 2009 ACM.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neubauer, N., & Obermayer, K. (2009). Hyperincident connected components of tagging networks. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, HT’09 (pp. 229–238). https://doi.org/10.1145/1557914.1557954

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free