Local flux-profile relationships of wind speed and temperature in a canopy layer in atmospheric stable conditions

9Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The particularities of the physics of the canopy layer pose challenges to the determination and use of traditional universal functions so helpful in the atmospheric surface layer. Progress toward 'universal-like functions' such as those provided by Monin-Obukhov similarity theory for the canopy layer has been modest. One of the challenges lies in that the assumptions underlying Monin-Obukhov similarity theory do not hold within a canopy layer. This paper thus examines the local flux-profile relations for wind (Φm) and for temperature (Φm). It uses three different stability parameters, i.e., h/L(h) at tree top, local z/L(z) and the local bulk Richardson number (Ri), within a tall forest canopy in nighttime stable (indicated by h/L(h) > 0) conditions. Results suggest that the in-canopy øm can be described using the local Richardson number Ri. Furthermore, Φm is found to increase linearly with Ri in the upper canopy layer for |Ri| < 1. When local |Ri| > 1. However, Φh |Φm| decreases with |Ri| in a power function, a result consistent for all levels of measurements within the canopy. When both local Φ4 and local Ri are positive, i.e., the local downward turbulent heat flux is consistent with the local temperature gradient, the local increases with the local Ri when Ri < 1. However, Φh does not change with Ri (or much more scattered) when Ri > 1. The relationship between local Φm and Ri disappears when counter-gradient heat transfer occurs in strongly stable conditions. A self-correlation analysis is used to examine the influence of self-correlation and the physical meaning of these relationships. © Author(s) 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, G., Leclerc, M. Y., & Karipot, A. (2010). Local flux-profile relationships of wind speed and temperature in a canopy layer in atmospheric stable conditions. Biogeosciences, 7(11), 3625–3636. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-3625-2010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free