Maximal Nerve Excitability Testing vs Electroneuronography

102Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In an article published in 1977, Adour et al compared electroneuronography (neuromyography) with maximal nerve excitability testing (NET) and reached the conclusion that the prognostic value of the latter was more reliable in facial paralysis. Further analysis of the results of Adour et al leads, however, to the opposite conclusion and illustrates how one may avoid the pitfalls that exist in using electrical stimulation to evaluate facial nerve function. Certainly, electroneuronography (ENoG) is not a foolproof method and experience is needed in order to avoid errors in technique and to achieve reproducible results. The great advantage of ENoG vs maximal NET is the quantitative analysis of the number of degenerated fibers and the assessment of an accurate degeneration profile in Bell's palsy. © 1980, American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fisch, U. (1980). Maximal Nerve Excitability Testing vs Electroneuronography. Archives of Otolaryngology, 106(6), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1980.00790300040008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free