Metagovernance, Network Structure, and Legitimacy: Developing a Heuristic for Comparative Governance Analysis

20Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article develops a heuristic for comparative governance analysis. The heuristic depicts four network types by combining network structure with the state’s capacity to metagovern. It suggests that each network type produces a particular combination of input and output legitimacy. We illustrate the heuristic and its utility using a comparative study of agri-food networks (organic farming and land use) in four countries, which each exhibit different combinations of input and output legitimacy respectively. The article concludes by using a fifth case study to illustrate what a network type that produces high levels of input and output legitimacy might look like.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Daugbjerg, C., & Fawcett, P. (2017). Metagovernance, Network Structure, and Legitimacy: Developing a Heuristic for Comparative Governance Analysis. Administration and Society, 49(9), 1223–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free