Lizardo argues that The Social Theory of Practices is refuted by the discovery of mirror neurons. The book argues that the kind of sameness of tacit mental content assumed by practice theorists such as Bourdieu is fictional, because there is no actual process by which the same mental content can be transmitted. Mirror neurons, Lizardo claims, provide such a mechanism, as they imply that bodily automatisms, which can be understood as the basis of habitus and concepts, can be shared and copied from one person to another. This response to Lizardo points out that the Gallese arguments on which Lizardo relies relate to phylogenetic and universal body movements, not to the learned movements characteristic of practices, and that there is no sameness producing mechanism parallel to the genetic one. © 2007 The Author Journal compilation © The Executive Management Committee/Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2007.
CITATION STYLE
Turner, S. P. (2007). Mirror neurons and practices: A response to Lizardo. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(3), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00342.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.