Nitrogen uptake and regeneration pathways in the equatorial Pacific: A basin scale modeling study

9Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is well known that most primary production is fueled by regenerated nitrogen in the open ocean. Therefore, studying the nitrogen cycle by focusing on uptake and regeneration pathways would advance our understanding of nitrogen dynamics in the marine ecosystem. Here, we carry out a basin-scale modeling study, by assessing model simulations of nitrate and ammonium, and rates of nitrate uptake, ammonium uptake and regeneration in the equatorial Pacific. Model-data comparisons show that the model is able to reproduce many observed features of nitrate, ammonium, such as the deep ammonium maximum (DAM). The model also reproduces the observed de-coupling of ammonium uptake and regeneration, i.e., regeneration rate greater than uptake rate in the lower euphotic zone. The de-coupling largely explains the observed DAM in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Our study indicates that zooplankton excretion and remineralization of organic nitrogen play a different role in nitrogen regeneration. Rates of zooplankton excretion vary from <0.01 mmolm -3d-1 to 0.1 mmol m-3d-1 in the upper euphotic zone while rates of remineralization fall within a narrow range (0.015-0.025 mmolm-3d-1. Zooplankton excretion contributes up to 70% of total ammonium regeneration in the euphotic zone, and is largely responsible for the spatial variability of nitrogen regeneration. However, remineralization provides a steady supply of ammonium in the upper ocean, and is a major source of inorganic nitrogen for the oligotrophic regions. Overall, ammonium generation and removal are approximately balanced over the top 150 m in the equatorial Pacific.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, X. J., Murtugudde, R., & Le Borgne, R. (2009). Nitrogen uptake and regeneration pathways in the equatorial Pacific: A basin scale modeling study. Biogeosciences, 6(11), 2647–2660. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2647-2009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free