Parameters Controlling Tensile and Compressive Strength of Artificially Cemented Sand

  • Consoli N
  • Cruz R
  • Floss M
  • et al.
248Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Enhancement of local soils with fibers and cement for the construction of stabilized pavement bases, canal lining, and support layers for shallow foundations shows great economical and environmental advantages, avoiding the use of borrow materials from elsewhere, in addition to the need of a spoil area. In previous studies, a unique dosage methodology for cemented soils has been established based on rational criteria in which the porosity-to-cement ratio plays a fundamental role in the assessment of the target unconfined compressive strength (qu). The present paper extends previous work by quantifying the influence of the amount of cement, the porosity, and the poros- ity-to-cement ratio in an assessment on tensile strength (qt) and compressive strength of a fiber-reinforced artificially cemented sand, in addition to the evaluation of the qt=qu relationship. A program of splitting tensile tests and unconfined compression tests considering four distinct dry densities and five cement contents, varying from 1–7%, was carried out in the research reported in this paper. The results showthat a power function adapts qt and qu values well with increasing cement content and reducing porosity of the compacted mixture. The porosity- to-cement ratio is an appropriate parameter to assess both tensile strength and unconfined compressive strength of the fiber-reinforced sand/ cement mixture studied. Finally, the qt=qu relationship is unique for the fiber-reinforced sand/cement studied, being independent of the porosity-to-cement ratio.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Consoli, N. C., Cruz, R. C., Floss, M. F., & Festugato, L. (2010). Parameters Controlling Tensile and Compressive Strength of Artificially Cemented Sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136(5), 759–763. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000278

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free