Peri-Adriatic mélanges and their evolution in the Tethyan realm

69Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the peri-Adriatic region, mélanges represent a significant component of the Apennine and Dinaride-Albanide-Hellenide orogenic belts as well as ancient and present-day accretionary wedges. Different mélange types in this broad region provide an excellent case study to investigate the mode and nature of main processes (tectonic, sedimentary, and diapiric) involved in mélange formation in contrasting geodynamic settings. We present a preliminary subdivision and classification of the peri-Adriatic melanges based on several years of field studies on chaotic rock bodies, including detailed structural and stratigraphic analyses. Six main categories of melanges are distinguished on the basis of the processes and geodynamic settings of their formation. These mélange types are spatially and temporally associated with extensional tectonics, passive margin evolution, strike-slip tectonics, oceanic crust subduction, continental collision, and deformation. There appears to have been a strong interplay and some overlap between tectonic, sedimentary, and diapiric processes during mélange formation; however, in highly deformed regions, it is still possible to distinguish those melanges that formed in different geodynamic environments and their main processes of formation. This study shows that a strong relationship exists between melange-forming processes and the palaeogeographic settings and conditions of mélange formation. Given the differences in age, geographic location, and evolutionary patterns, we document the relative importance of mélanges and broken formations in the tectonic evolution of the peri-Adriatic mountain belts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Festa, A., Pini, G. A., Dilek, Y., Codegone, G., Vezzani, L., Ghisetti, F., … Ogata, K. (2010). Peri-Adriatic mélanges and their evolution in the Tethyan realm. International Geology Review, 52(4–6), 369–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206810902949886

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free