Abstract
Can physicalism (or materialism) be non‐reductive? I provide an opinionated survey of the debate on this question. I suggest that attempts to formulate non‐reductive physicalism by appeal to claims of event identity, supervenience, or realization have produced doctrines that fail either to be physicalist or to be non‐reductive. Then I treat in more detail a recent attempt to formulate non‐reductive physicalism by Derk Pereboom, but argue that it fares no better.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Melnyk, A. (2008). Can Physicalism Be Non‐Reductive? Philosophy Compass, 3(6), 1281–1296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00184.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free