Population objects: Interpassive subjects

143Citations
Citations of this article
135Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While Foucault described population as the object of biopower he did not investigate the practices that make it possible to know population. Rather, he tended to overemphasize it as an object on which power can act. However, population is not an object awaiting discovery, but is represented and enacted by specific devices such as censuses and what I call population metrics. The latter enact populations by assembling different categories and measurements of subjects (biographical, biometric and transactional) in myriad ways to identify and measure the performance of populations. I account for both the object and subject by thinking about how devices consist of agencements; that is, specific arrangements of humans and technologies whose mediations and interactions not only enact populations but also produce subjects. I suggest that population metrics render subjects interpassive whereby other beings or objects take up the role and act in place of the subject. © The Author(s) 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruppert, E. (2011). Population objects: Interpassive subjects. Sociology, 45(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510394027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free