Proof-theoretic semantics for classical mathematics

2Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We discuss the semantical categories of base and object implicit in the Curry-Howard theory of types and we derive derive logic and, in particular, the comprehension principle in the classical version of the theory. Two results that apply to both the classical and the constructive theory are discussed. First, compositional semantics for the theory does not demand 'incomplete objects' in the sense of Frege: bound variables are in principle eliminable. Secondly, the relation of extensional equality for each type is definable in the Curry-Howard theory. © Springer 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tait, W. W. (2006, February). Proof-theoretic semantics for classical mathematics. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6271-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free