Public Knowledge

12Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper argues that the public can do more than legitimate government; it can provide public knowledge for sound public policy. Critics of democracy worry that the public has too little objectivity and impartiality to know what is best. These critics have a point: taken one by one, people have little knowledge of the whole. For this reason, citizens need to escape the cloisters of kith and kin and enter a world of unlike others. They need to be open to other perspectives and concerns. They need to deliberate with others in public. In other words, an inchoate plurality of people needs to become public in order to develop a more comprehensive picture of the whole and to define ‘where the shoe pinches’. Democracy requires that the multitude deliberate publicly in order to create public knowledge by which sound public policy can be formed. © 2004, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mcafee, N. (2004). Public Knowledge. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 30(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453704041241

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free