Quantifying the model structural error in carbon cycle data assimilation systems

33Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study explores the impact of the structural error of biosphere models when assimilating net ecosystem exchange (NEE) measurements or CO2 concentration measurements to optimise uncertain model parameters within carbon cycle data assimilation systems (CCDASs). This error has been proven difficult to identify and is often neglected in the total uncertainty budget. We propose a simple method which is derived from the model-minus-observation mismatch statistics. This diagnosis is applied to a state-of-the-art biogeochemical model using measurements of the net surface CO2 flux at twelve sites located in temperate, deciduous, broadleaf forests. We find that the structural model error in the NEE space has a standard deviation of 1.5 to 1.7 gC m -2 d-1, without a significant correlation structure beyond the lag of a few days, and a large spatial structure that can be approximated with an exponential decay of e-folding length of 500 km. In the space of concentrations, its characteristics are commensurate with the transport errors, both for surface air sample measurements and total column measurements. The inferred characteristics are confirmed by complementary optimality diagnostics performed after site-scale parameter optimisations. © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuppel, S., Chevallier, F., & Peylin, P. (2013). Quantifying the model structural error in carbon cycle data assimilation systems. Geoscientific Model Development, 6(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-45-2013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free