Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion

ISSN: 00049514
319Citations
Citations of this article
446Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In symptomatic subjects, the reliability of tests for shoulder joint range of motion has yet to be determined. For this reason, inter-rater and intra-rater agreement trials were undertaken to ascertain the reliability of visual estimation, goniometry, still photography, "stand and reach" and hand behind back reach for six different shoulder movements. Intra-class correlation coefficients (Rho) were derived by using a random effects model. For flexion, abduction and external rotation fair to good reliability was demonstrated for both trials using visual estimation (inter-rater Rho = 0.57-0.70; intra-rater Rho = 0.59-0.67), goniometry (inter-rater Rho = 0.64-0.69; intra-rater Rho = 0.53-0.65) and still photography (inter-rater Rho = 0.62-0.73; intra-rater Rho = 0.56-0.61). The tests had standard errors of measurement of between 14 and 25 degrees (inter-rater trial) and 11 and 23 degrees (intra-rater trial).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hayes, K., Walton, J. R., Szomor, Z. L., & Murrell, G. A. C. (2001). Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 47(4), 289–294.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free