Abstract
Abstract A protected areas system (PAS) is effective only when it adequately includes a representative sample of important geophysical and biological features, including critically endangered biota of a region. However, protected areas in Nepal, as in many parts of the world, have been established on an ad hoc basis, and thus one or more important features have been overlooked. We conducted a gap analysis and developed a comparison index to assess the representativeness of geophysical features (physiography, altitude, and ecoregions), species diversity, and endangered species listed in International Union for Nature Conservation (IUCN) and Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) by using a Geographical Information System (GIS) framework. The analysis indicated that more than two thirds (67.84%) of the total area of protected areas (PAs) is in high mountains, although this region accounts for only 23.92% of the country's total area. The hills comprise the hig...
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Shrestha, U. B., Shrestha, S., Chaudhary, P., & Chaudhary, R. P. (2010). How Representative is the Protected Areas System of Nepal? Mountain Research and Development, 30(3), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd-journal-d-10-00019.1
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.