Restraints and the code of ethics: An uneasy fit

47Citations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article examines the use of physical restraints through the four broad principles of ethics common to all helping professions. It asks whether the continued use of physical restraints is consistent with ethical practice through the lens of those principles. It also examines where the necessity to use restraints in the absence of empirically supported alternatives leaves professionals in terms of conflicts between ethical principles and makes recommendations for changes in education and clinical practice. It concludes that an analysis through a bioethics lens demonstrates that the use of restraints as a tool in psychiatric settings is a complex and multifaceted problem. Principles of ethics may often be in conflict with each other in instances where patients must be physically restrained. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohr, W. K. (2010, February). Restraints and the code of ethics: An uneasy fit. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2009.03.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free