Safety standards: An urgent need for evidence-based regulation

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This opinion article describes and analyses some of the consequences of the ever-growing stringency of regulatory standards in the field of drugs and vaccines for human health, with distinct issues in the developed and developing countries. It is argued that the cost and benefit of safety standards, prior and after implementation, are not sufficiently evaluated, nor sufficiently informed by science. We suspect that, as a result, significant amounts of public and private money might be misspent, because assessments of risks/benefits are often questionable, sometimes out of context and inadequate. It is suggested that, just as it happened in medicine 30 years ago, a move towards Evidence-Based Regulation should be promoted. Given the probable and predictable negative impacts on costs and innovation, both in developed and developing countries-particularly in the latter where the needs are huge and the resources highly limited-we contend that such a move is urgently needed. © Author(s) 2008.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kourilsky, P., & Giri, I. (2008). Safety standards: An urgent need for evidence-based regulation. Sapiens, 1(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.5194/sapiens-1-105-2008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free