Short-term creatine supplementation does not improve muscle activation or sprint performance in humans

36Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of short-term creatine (Cr) supplementation on exercise-induced transverse relaxation time (T2) and sprint performance during maximum intermittent cycling exercise using the muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (mfMRI) technique. Twelve men were divided into a Cr supplementation group [the Cr group, taking 4 × (5 g Cr monohydrate + 2.5 g maltodextrin)/day], or a placebo supplementation group (the P group, taking 4×7.5 g maltodextrin/day). The allocation to the groups was based on cycling tests and the subject's physical characteristics, and thus was not randomized. A double-blind research design was employed for a 5-day supplementation period. mfMR images of the right thigh were collected at rest and immediately after two, five, and ten 6-s sprint bouts of maximum intermittent cycling exercise with a 30-s recovery interval between sets. Before and after supplementation, blood was taken to calculate lactate accumulation, and the muscle volume of the thigh was determined by MRI. Following supplementation, there was significant body mass gain in the Cr group (P < 0.05), whereas the P group did not change. The exercise-induced T2, blood lactate level and sprint performance were not affected by Cr supplementation in any sprint bouts. These results suggest that short-term Cr supplementation does not influence short duration repetitive sprint performance and muscle activation and/or metabolic state during sprint cyclin evaluated by mfMRI of the skeletal muscle in humans. © Springer-Verlag 2003.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kinugasa, R., Akima, H., Ota, A., Ohta, A., Sugiura, K., & Kuno, S. Y. (2004). Short-term creatine supplementation does not improve muscle activation or sprint performance in humans. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 91(2–3), 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0970-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free