Statistical framework for evaluation of climate model simulations by use of climate proxy data from the last millennium-Part 3: Practical considerations, relaxed assumptions, and using tree-ring data to address the amplitude of solar forcing

11Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A statistical framework for evaluation of climate model simulations by comparison with climate observations from instrumental and proxy data (part 1 in this series) is improved by the relaxation of two assumptions. This allows autocorrelation in the statistical model for simulated internal climate variability and enables direct comparison of two alternative forced simulations to test whether one fits the observations significantly better than the other. The extended framework is applied to a set of simulations driven with forcings for the pre-industrial period 1000-1849 CE and 15 tree-ring-based temperature proxy series. Simulations run with only one external forcing (land use, volcanic, small-amplitude solar, or large-amplitude solar) do not significantly capture the variability in the tree-ring data-although the simulation with volcanic forcing does so for some experiment settings. When all forcings are combined (using either the small-or large-amplitude solar forcing), including also orbital, greenhouse-gas and non-volcanic aerosol forcing, and additionally used to produce small simulation ensembles starting from slightly different initial ocean conditions, the resulting simulations are highly capable of capturing some observed variability. Nevertheless, for some choices in the experiment design, they are not significantly closer to the observations than when unforced simulations are used, due to highly variable results between regions. It is also not possible to tell whether the small-amplitude or large-amplitude solar forcing causes the multiple-forcing simulations to be closer to the reconstructed temperature variability. Proxy data from more regions and of more types, or representing larger regions and complementary seasons, are apparently needed for more conclusive results from model-data comparisons in the last millennium.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moberg, A., Sundberg, R., Grudd, H., & Hind, A. (2015). Statistical framework for evaluation of climate model simulations by use of climate proxy data from the last millennium-Part 3: Practical considerations, relaxed assumptions, and using tree-ring data to address the amplitude of solar forcing. Climate of the Past, 11(3), 425–448. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-425-2015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free