Still Better Never to Have Been: A Reply to (More of) My Critics

40Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

In Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence, I argued that coming into existence is always a harm and that procreation is wrong. In this paper, I respond to those of my critics to whom I have not previously responded. More specifically, I engage the objections of Tim Bayne, Ben Bradley, Campbell Brown, David DeGrazia, Elizabeth Harman, Chris Kaposy, Joseph Packer and Saul Smilansky. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Benatar, D. (2013). Still Better Never to Have Been: A Reply to (More of) My Critics. Journal of Ethics, 17(1–2), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-012-9133-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free