Sustainable development indicators: A scientific challenge, a democratic issue

63Citations
Citations of this article
229Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Social indicators, and therefore sustainable development indicators also, are scientific constructs whose principal objective is to inform public policy-making. Their usefulness is dependant on tradeoffs between scientific soundness and rigor, political effectiveness and democratic legitimacy. The paper considers in this perspective three important stages in the building of sustainable development indicators: the identification of the various dimensions underlying the concept of sustainable development, the process of aggregating lower dimension indicators in higher level composite indices and the attribution of weights at various levels of the indicators hierarchy. More specifically, it assesses the relative fruitfulness for indicators construction of the four most widespread conceptions of sustainable development, in terms of domains or pillars (economy, society, and environment), in terms of resources and productive assets (manufactured, natural, human and social capitals), in terms of human well-being (needs, capabilities) or in terms of norms (efficiency, fairness, prudence). It concludes with a plea for the construction of synthetic indices able to compete with and complement the GNP as an indicator of development. © Author(s) 2008.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boulanger, P. M. (2008). Sustainable development indicators: A scientific challenge, a democratic issue. Sapiens, 1(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.5194/sapiens-1-59-2008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free