Towards argumentation-based contract negotiation

ISSN: 18798314
30Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present an argumentation-based approach to contract negotiation amongst agents. Contracts are simply viewed as abstract transactions of items between a buyer agent and a seller agent, characterised by a number of features. Agents are equipped with beliefs, goals, and preferences. Goals are classified as either structural or contractual. In order to agree on a contract, agents engage in a two-phase negotiation process: in the first phase, the buyer agent decides on (a selection of) items fulfilling its structural goals and preferences; in the second phase, the buyer agent decides on a subset of the items identified in the first phase fulfilling its contractual goals and preferences. The first phase is supported by argumentation-based decision making taking preferences into account. © 2008 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dung, P. M., Thang, P. M., & Toni, F. (2008). Towards argumentation-based contract negotiation. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (Vol. 172, pp. 134–146). IOS Press BV.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free