Towards a BPMN semantics using UML models
Page 1
Towards a BPMN semantics using UML models
Introduction
Towards BPMN semantics
Discussions
Towards a BPMN semantics using UML
models
Oana Nicolae1 Mirel Cosulschi2 Adrian Giurca1
Gerd Wagner1
1Department of Internet Technology
Brandenburg Technical University at Cottbus, Germany
2Department of Computer Science
University at Craiova, Romania
2nd International Workshop on Collaborative Business
Processes, 2008
Milano, Italy
O. Nicolae, M. Cosulschi, A. Giurca, G. Wagner Towards a BPMN semantics using UML models
Towards BPMN semantics
Discussions
Towards a BPMN semantics using UML
models
Oana Nicolae1 Mirel Cosulschi2 Adrian Giurca1
Gerd Wagner1
1Department of Internet Technology
Brandenburg Technical University at Cottbus, Germany
2Department of Computer Science
University at Craiova, Romania
2nd International Workshop on Collaborative Business
Processes, 2008
Milano, Italy
O. Nicolae, M. Cosulschi, A. Giurca, G. Wagner Towards a BPMN semantics using UML models
Page 2
Introduction
Towards BPMN semantics
Discussions
Motivation
BPMN Specification
Service Interaction Patterns
Actual context ...
Standard initiatives claim to be a consequence of the BPM market maturity.
Specifications do NOT succeed to provide a well defined semantic of standards,
but only an informal description of the languages.
Open/Proprietary tools do NOT succeed to generate executable code.
... and Consequences
Open/Proprietary tools that implement the Specifications do NOT make a clear
distinction between the Specification they implement and their own
requirements. This results in different alternatives of code.
A common understanding of the concepts is then needed.
O. Nicolae, M. Cosulschi, A. Giurca, G. Wagner Towards a BPMN semantics using UML models
Towards BPMN semantics
Discussions
Motivation
BPMN Specification
Service Interaction Patterns
Actual context ...
Standard initiatives claim to be a consequence of the BPM market maturity.
Specifications do NOT succeed to provide a well defined semantic of standards,
but only an informal description of the languages.
Open/Proprietary tools do NOT succeed to generate executable code.
... and Consequences
Open/Proprietary tools that implement the Specifications do NOT make a clear
distinction between the Specification they implement and their own
requirements. This results in different alternatives of code.
A common understanding of the concepts is then needed.
O. Nicolae, M. Cosulschi, A. Giurca, G. Wagner Towards a BPMN semantics using UML models
Sign up today - FREE
Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more
- All your research in one place
- Add and import papers easily
- Access it anywhere, anytime
Start using Mendeley in seconds!
Readership Statistics
2 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
by Academic Status
100% Ph.D. Student
by Country
50% Germany
50% Malaysia