Sign up & Download
Sign in

Training Module 1 : Using Stata for Survey Data Analysis

by Nicholas Minot
Analysis ()

Abstract

The equilibrium geometries and bond dissociation energies of 16-valence-electron(VE) complexes (PMe(3))(2)Cl(2)M(E) and 18-VE complexes (PMe(3))(2)(CO)(2)M(E) with M=Fe, Ru, Os and E=C, Si, Ge, Sn were calculated by using density functional theory at the BP86/TZ2P level. The nature of the M-E bond was analyzed with the NBO charge decomposition analysis and the EDA energy-decomposition analysis. The theoretical results predict that the heavier Group 14 complexes (PMe(3))(2)Cl(2)M(E) and (PMe(3))(2)(CO)(2)M(E) with E=Si, Ge, Sn have C(2v) equilibrium geometries in which the PMe(3) ligands are in the axial positions. The complexes have strong M-E bonds which are slightly stronger in the 16-VE species 1ME than in the 18-VE complexes 2ME. The calculated bond dissociation energies show that the M-E bonds become weaker in both series in the order C>Si>Ge>Sn; the bond strength increases in the order FeE pi-acceptor bonds, which are not degenerate. The shape of the frontier orbitals reveals that the HOMO-2 sigma MO and the LUMO and LUMO+1 pi MOs of 1ME are very similar to the frontier orbitals of CO.

Cite this document (BETA)

Available from www.ifpri.org
Page 1
hidden
Page 2
hidden
Page 3
hidden
Page 4
hidden
Page 5
hidden
Page 6
hidden
Page 7
hidden
Page 8
hidden
Page 9
hidden
Page 10
hidden
Page 11
hidden
Page 12
hidden
Page 13
hidden
Page 14
hidden
Page 15
hidden

Authors on Mendeley

Readership Statistics

10 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
30% Researcher (at a non-Academic Institution)
 
20% Ph.D. Student
 
20% Assistant Professor
by Country
 
20% United States
 
10% Japan
 
10% Italy

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in