Abstract
In this article, I respond to the recent work of Kaminski, Sloutsky, and Heckler (2008a). I advance two major concerns about their research and its applicability to learning mathematics: a confounding variable that arises from the mathematical differences between the generic examples and concrete examples poses a threat to the construct validity of the experiments, and the overgeneralization of the success of the treatment, given that the measure of success is a prompted near-transfer task.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Jones, M. G. (2009). Transfer, abstraction, and context. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.2.0080
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.