Truth and beauty in scientific reason

30Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A rationalist and realist model of scientific revolutions will be constructed by reference to two categories of criteria of theory-evaluation, denominated indicators of truth and of beauty. Whereas indicators of truth are formulated a priori and thus unite science in the pursuit of verisimilitude, aesthetic criteria are inductive constructs which lag behind the progression of theories in truthlikeness. Revolutions occur when the evaluative divergence between the two categories of criteria proves too wide to be recomposed or overlooked. This model of revolutions depends upon a substantial new treatment of aesthetic criteria in science with which much of the paper will therefore be occupied. © 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mcallister, J. W. (1989). Truth and beauty in scientific reason. Synthese, 78(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869680

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free