Upstream to downstream: A multiple-assessment-point approach for targeting non-point-source priority management areas at large watershed scale

12Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The identification of priority management areas (PMAs) is essential for the control of non-point-source (NPS) pollution, especially for a large-scale watershed. However, previous studies have typically focused on small-scale catchments adjacent to specific assessment points; thus, the interactions between multiple river points remain poorly understood. In this study, a multiple-assessment-point PMA (MAP-PMA) framework was proposed by integrating the upstream sources and the downstream transport aspects of NPS pollution. Daning River watershed was taken as a case study in this paper, which has demonstrated that the integration of the upstream input changes was vital for the final PMAs map, especially for downstream areas. Contrary to conventional wisdom, this research recommended that the NPS pollutants could be best controlled among the upstream high-level PMAs when protecting the water quality of the entire watershed. The MAP-PMA framework provided a more cost-effective tool for the establishment of conservation practices, especially for a large-scale watershed. © 2014 Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, L., Zhong, Y., Wei, G., & Shen, Z. (2014). Upstream to downstream: A multiple-assessment-point approach for targeting non-point-source priority management areas at large watershed scale. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18(4), 1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1265-2014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free