Weak Alternating Automata Are Not that Weak

175Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Automata on infinite words are used for specification and verification of nonterminating programs. Different types of automata induce different levels of expressive power, of succinctness, and of complexity. Alternating automata have both existential and universal branching modes and are particularly suitable for specification of programs. In a weak alternating automaton, the state space is partitioned into partially ordered sets, and the automaton can proceed from a certain set only to smaller sets. Reasoning about weak alternating automata is easier than reasoning about alternating automata with no restricted structure. Known translations of alternating automata to weak alternating automata involve determinization, and therefore involve a double-exponential blow-up. In this paper we describe a quadratic translation, which circumvents the need for determinization, of Büchi and co-Büchi alternating automata to weak alternating automata. Beyond the independent interest of such a translation, it gives rise to a simple complementation algorithm for nondeterministic Büchi automata. © 2001, ACM. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kupferman, O., & Vardi, M. Y. (2001). Weak Alternating Automata Are Not that Weak. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 2(3), 408–429. https://doi.org/10.1145/377978.377993

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free