Wittgenstein on Private Language

  • Garver N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

COULD WE IMAGINE A LANGUAGE IN WHICH A PERSON COULDEXPRESS HIS INNER SENSATIONS OR EXPERIENCES FOR HIS PRIVATEUSE? THE AUTHOR EXPLICATES WITTGENSTEIN'S VIEWS, GIVINGONE, AN EXPOSE OF CERTAIN CONSIDERATIONS WHICH LENDPLAUSIBILITY TO THE NOTION OF A PRIVATE LANGUAGE, AND TWO,A REDUCTION "AD ABSURDUM" OF THE NOTION OF A PRIVATELANGUAGE OR PRIVATE UNDERSTANDING. THE UTILITY OF A SIGNAND ITS INTELLIGIBILITY IN THE COMMON LANGUAGE GO HAND INHAND; A SIGN WHICH IS SUPPOSED TO BE SIMPLY "ASSOCIATED"WITH A SENSATION CANNOT HAVE A USE. HENCE, ANY SIGN WHICHHAS A USE CANNOT BE SIMPLY ASSOCIATED WITH A SENSATION.(STAFF)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garver, N. (1960). Wittgenstein on Private Language. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 20(3), 389. https://doi.org/10.2307/2105058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free