Written training tasks are better than oral training tasks at improving L2 learners' speech production

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study examined the effect of written input on the production of word-final vowels (oral: i, e; nasal: É') by 100 native Moroccan learners of French as a second language, relying on a pretest/posttest paradigm. During pretest, participants performed a word repetition task. Then, participants were assigned to five experimental (training) conditions, varying in the modality of stimulus presentation (oral vs. written) and in the modality of response (oral vs. written), before their oral production of the word-final vowels was evaluated in the posttest. Results clearly showed that posttest pronunciation accuracy was affected by the presence of orthographic information in the training task. The copy training task was the most efficient at improving posttest accuracy. Results indicate that orthography, and more specifically the written production copy task, helps L2 learners' pronunciation more efficiently than phonetic correction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Solier, C., Perret, C., Baqué, L., & Soum-Favaro, C. (2019). Written training tasks are better than oral training tasks at improving L2 learners’ speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(6), 1455–1480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641900033X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free