Abstract
The objective was to assess the medicoeconomic impact of initial and subsequent treatments based on oral fludarabine, intravenous chemotherapy (mini-CHOP) and chlorambucil in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. A Markov model has been defined to encompass the 18 strategies over a 3-year period after starting the first treatment. Costs of treatments, side effects and follow-up have been calculated by crossing data from published prospective trials, specific hospital databases and French resource-based relative value scales. When treatments were based on mini-CHOP, different possibilities offered for hospital care were taken into account. Probalistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Whatever the modality of hospital care for mini-CHOP, the strategies based on oral fludarabine as first-line treatment are not only more effective but are also cost effective and dominate other types of scenarios. Fludarabine given orally should be preferred to mini-CHOP or chlorambucil as a first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. © 2007 Informa UK Ltd.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dervaux, B., Lenne, X., Theis, D., D’Alche-Gautier, M. J., Rufat, P., Cazin, B., … Leporrier, M. (2007). Cost effectiveness of oral fludarabine in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: The French case. Journal of Medical Economics, 10(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.3111/13696990701571585
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.