Cost effectiveness of oral fludarabine in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: The French case

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective was to assess the medicoeconomic impact of initial and subsequent treatments based on oral fludarabine, intravenous chemotherapy (mini-CHOP) and chlorambucil in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. A Markov model has been defined to encompass the 18 strategies over a 3-year period after starting the first treatment. Costs of treatments, side effects and follow-up have been calculated by crossing data from published prospective trials, specific hospital databases and French resource-based relative value scales. When treatments were based on mini-CHOP, different possibilities offered for hospital care were taken into account. Probalistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Whatever the modality of hospital care for mini-CHOP, the strategies based on oral fludarabine as first-line treatment are not only more effective but are also cost effective and dominate other types of scenarios. Fludarabine given orally should be preferred to mini-CHOP or chlorambucil as a first-line treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. © 2007 Informa UK Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dervaux, B., Lenne, X., Theis, D., D’Alche-Gautier, M. J., Rufat, P., Cazin, B., … Leporrier, M. (2007). Cost effectiveness of oral fludarabine in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: The French case. Journal of Medical Economics, 10(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.3111/13696990701571585

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free